An ASX-Listed Industrial Giant Chose ConstructMind AI to Modernise Its Capital Project Planning

When one of Australia's most recognised publicly listed companies needed a consistent, auditable way to plan capital projects at scale, they turned to ConstructMind AI.

CLIENT

ASX-Listed Enterprise

INDUSTRY

Industrial / Resources

PROJECT TYPES

Capital and Maintenance Projects

ENGAGEMENT

Enterprise Implementation

Client identity is withheld at their request, consistent with construction industry practice.

BACKGROUND

A publicly listed enterprise with the scale to demand better, and the governance obligations to require it

This ASX-listed organisation operates across multiple industry sectors and manages a large portfolio of capital and maintenance projects across its business units. With board-level visibility over capital expenditure and regulatory obligations around project governance, the quality and consistency of project planning is not just an operational concern. It is a compliance and shareholder accountability matter.

Each project follows a lifecycle covering design, procurement, and delivery, all leading to a critical shutdown window with hard, immovable dates. Planning was being handled in Microsoft Project by project managers who were not dedicated planners. There was no centralised productivity library, no formal scheduling standards applied at the project level, and no consistent way to validate whether a proposed schedule was realistic.

With their existing planning platform nearing retirement and internal restructuring creating new demands on the planning function, the organisation needed a solution that could deliver consistent, defensible outputs at scale, without requiring every project manager to become a scheduling expert.

THE CHALLENGE

Four problems that were impossible to solve with
spreadsheets alone

Inconsistent outputs

Project managers were creating schedules individually with no shared framework, resulting in inconsistent outputs across the portfolio.

Undefendable durations

Duration estimates were based on personal recall rather than documented historical data, making them difficult to defend or audit.

No document-to-schedule

There was no system to link the scope of work document directly to a schedule. Every plan was built from scratch, manually.

No portfolio view

Management had no consolidated view across projects, making it impossible to assess portfolio-level risk or resource demand.

"We want it to be really lean: dump in the scope of work, get a schedule back with the planning logic and risk flagged, and hand it to management for approval. They should not have to think too much about planning."

Senior Planner, Industrial Client

THE SOLUTION

ConstructMind configured around how this organisation actually works

Rather than forcing the client into a generic scheduling tool, ConstructMind was configured around the organisation's specific project types, governance requirements, and existing document templates.

Organisation Setup

ConstructMind's Organisation Configurator was used to capture the client's business unit structure, scheduling standards, calendar models, and governance rules, including which fields project managers could override and which were locked by portfolio-level policy.

Template and WBS Library Configuration

The client's existing WBS governance templates were ingested into ConstructMind as schedule templates. These became the AI reference point, ensuring every generated schedule aligned with the organisation's minimum planning requirements from the start.

Expenditure Authorisation as the Trigger Document

The organisation uses an Expenditure Authorisation (EA) document for every capital project. ConstructMind was configured to read the EA as the primary input, extracting scope, key dates, and contract requirements, and use it to automatically generate a draft schedule matched to the most
relevant template

Assumption Transparency and Validation Rules

Where the AI made assumptions due to missing data or ambiguous scope, those assumptions were surfaced explicitly so project managers could review and accept them. This replaced silent guesswork with a documented, auditable basis for every schedule.

Export and Integration

Completed schedules could be exported in P6 XER, MS Project MPP, and XML formats, allowing the organisation to take outputs into their existing reporting and oversight tools without changing
downstream workflows.

OUTCOMES

Enterprise-grade results at project manager speed, with an audit trail that meets board-level scrutiny

7 to 10

onstructMind to the client's standards, templates, and governance requirements

<30m

Time for a project manager to generate a compliant, logic-linked schedule from an Expenditure Authorisation document

Single consolidated portfolio view across all active projects, replacing disconnected individual files

"If everyone uses a similar quick structure, we will have a consistent plan under a certain framework, and management will have a clear view across the whole programme."

Planning Lead, Industrial Client

For an ASX-listed organisation, the decision to adopt a new AI platform is never taken lightly. It requires security compliance, vendor validation, IT procurement processes, and executive sign-off. ConstructMind AI earned that trust.

Capital Projects

Maintenance Planning

Shutdown Management

Schedule Generation

Org Configurator

Portfolio Visibility

P6 Export

Industrial / Resources

Australia

Ready to see ConstructMind on your projects?

Start with a free trial. We configure the platform to your organisation and hand over the keys.

Let’s build better
programmes

Ready to see how ConstructMind can transform your planning process?

Request a tailored demonstration and experience how quickly you can move from documents to a fully structured, defensible programme.

Unlock the potential of Construction AI

Fill out the form below